International Association for Hospice & Palliative Care

International Association for Hospice & Palliative Care

Donate to hospice online

Promoting Hospice & Palliative Care Worldwide

Ethics Articles of the Month

Ethical Issues in Palliative Care Index

Past ethics articles
of the month

 
Help the IAHPC
If you wish to donate to this program, click here  
Page Options
View Entire Document   Change Text Size
 
Quick Links

Donate to IAHPC

IAHPC Membership Join/Renew

Newsletters/Publications

Palliative Care Bookshop

Search Our Site


Site Map

Website Help

Contact Us

Home

IAHPC Programs
Faculty Development Program

Recognition Awards Program

Traveling Fellowships

Traveling Scholarships

Ways You Can Help the IAHPC
Donate to the IAHPC  
JOIN IAHPC
You can join/renew online
or phone us at:

Toll Free 1-866-374-2472
or 1-936-321-9846
spacer
Help the IAHPC

 
 
Free Newsletter
FREE Monthly Hospice & Palliative Care Newsletter
SIGNUP HERE
 
 
 
IAHPC Resources

Administrative and Program Development Tools

Pain & Palliative Care Assessment and Research Tools

Educational Resources


Funding / Grants

Information for Patients / Relatives

List of Essential Medicines for Palliative Care

Pain Relief and Palliative Care as Human Rights


Policy and Advocacy Tools

Standards for Palliative Care Provision

Treatment Guidelines


IAHPC Store
  Visit the IAHPC Store
 
Tell a friend
about this site!

Ethics Of Neonatal Pain Management


Dr Paulina Taboada
Profesor Centro de Bioetica
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Alameda 340 Correo Central 1
Santiago, Chile

The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 2001; 12, (3) is devoted to a special issue: Neonatal Ethics. Among the many interesting articles contained in the volume, there is one by Franck & Lefrack devoted to “The Ethical Treatment of Infant’s Pain" (pages 275-281).

Among the historical reasons why neonatal pain management has been neglected for decades, the authors mention facts like the special difficulties for an accurate pain evaluation in newborns; particular attitudinal barriers both on the side of care givers and parents; the conception of infants as not yet “full” human persons; etc.

Two clinical cases are presented to illustrate the influence of ethical considerations on the clinical treatment of pain in infants. One is a case of pain release for circumcision and the other post-operative pain management after major cardiac surgery. The authors show how inadequate decisions about pain-management frequently rest on attitudinal, ethical and/or moral barriers that scientific evidence alone cannot change.
Referring to the ‘Ethical Obligations’ pointed out in the ‘Core Curriculum for Professional Education in Pain’ by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP Press, Seattle, 1995), the authors discuss some ethical principles that are central to pain management, such as non-malfeasance, beneficence, autonomy, justice, fidelity and veracity. Hence, the beneficial effects of pain-release (principle of beneficence) have to be weighed against the harms of unrelieved neonatal pain as well as against the potential harms of the treatment (principle of non-malfeasance). The principle of justice demands that newborns get the same right to pain-management as adults.

In my opinion, the main contribution of the article is that it shows in an concrete way that in order “to promote a greater cohesion between the practice of pain management and ethics of neonatal care, we need to understand and appreciate the ethical principles that underpin the clinical management of neonatal pain” (p. 276). I see no reasons why this reflection would not apply to other fields of medical care  especially to Palliative Care.

Dr. Paulina Taboada, MD, PhD
Palliative Care and Bioethics

 

Need more information? Please contact us

 

Promoting Hospice & Palliative Care Worldwide

Home

Donations

IAHPC Programs Resources Bookshop Join Free Newsletter

Contact Us

© 2008 IAHPC